Banks Cling to TARP Five Years After Crisis
NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Small banks around the country continue to cling to billions of dollars in government assistance five years after Congress signed the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program -- or TARP -- into law.
TARP, like the direct injections the government made into faltering lenders like Bank of America
Paulson initially conceived TARP as a means to buy the soured mortgage and commercial real estate securities that plagued Wall Street in the fall of 2008. It was believed that taking impaired assets off of banks' books would help to shore up their balance sheets and restore confidence in the financial system. As the crisis worsened, Paulson altered TARP from an asset buying program into a direct injection of non-voting preferred capital into more than 700 banks across the country.
Effectively, the program acted as a recapitalization of the U.S. banking industry. And yet, even as banks like Lehman Brothers , Washington Mutual and Wachovia failed and lenders as large as Citigroup teetered on the brink of collapse, TARP was received skeptically by Congress, particularly the Republican party.
In fact, the first conception of the program was rejected by Congress in September 2008, forcing Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to go to Washington and warn of a looming economic collapse worse than the Great Depression. The bailout measure was only signed into law in early October under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, in a delay Paulson has said added a significant financial toll to the crisis.
In total, $245.1 billion in TARP money was invested in the banking system. As of Aug. 31, 2013, the Treasury has recovered $272.7 billion through repayments, dividends, interest, and other income -- a gain of $27.6 billion. Still, unlike other emergency measures instituted to pull the financial sector through the crisis, TARP is an ongoing program.
Overall, $3.3 billion in TARP investments remain outstanding, spread across more than a hundred institutions that still haven't achieved the financial health to repay bailout funds. Five years on, TARP's ongoing legacy signals a dual-speed recovery in the banking sector.
"The recovery in the banking sector has been uneven," Nancy Bush, a banking analyst at NAB Research , said in a September telephone interview. "The big banks obviously benefited from lot of the other liquidity programs."
TARP's biggest recipients such as "too big to fail" lenders like Bank of America and Citigroup have repaid their bailout funds at a profit to taxpayers.