Big Question Marks in Sysco's $3.5B Acquisition of U.S. Foods
NEW YORK (TheStreet) - Sysco's
Initial investor reaction indicated Sysco may have cut the deal of the year. At certain points in pre-market trading Monday, Sysco shares were nearly 40% higher than their Friday close, begging the question of whether U.S. Foods' private equity sellers had left some serious money on the table.
By the end of Monday's trading session, however, Sysco had lost most of its gains and closed up about 10%. As of Tuesday afternoon trading, Sysco shares are only up roughly 8% from their Friday close. Yes, Sysco's acquisition may be a good deal, but not as good as investors initially thought.
Sysco may be buying U.S. Foods at an opportunistic price, but also with the "buyer beware" caveat that any good management team is likely to weigh. Sysco, after all, has agreed to a $300 million termination fee that would represent 10% of the stock consideration of Monday's merger and a far larger percentage of the cash component.
The press release announcing Sysco's acquisition had a few eyebrow-raising details.
For one, CDR and KKR will be taking $3 billion of their deal proceeds in stock, giving both firms a total of 87 million Sysco shares, or roughly 13% of the company's outstanding stock. CDR and KKR also will have representatives join Sysco's board of directors. Nevertheless, neither private equity firm released a statement in Monday's deal announcement and both declined to comment when contacted by TheStreet.
U.S. Foods isn't likely to be a trophy investment for either CDR or KKR given that the firms bought the company in 2007 for $7.1 billion in cash and are now selling it to Sysco at an enterprise value of $8.2 billion. Still, depending on how Sysco's stock performs, it is conceivable U.S. Foods' former private equity sponsors could improve their investment returns.
Robert Kreidler, CFO of Sysco, indicated that CDR and KKR had considered an IPO, but instead chose a strategic exit and a minority investment in the acquirer.
"I think the owners have been analyzing their potential exit strategies. And prior to initiating something like an IPO or something like that, they wanted to talk about whether a strategic transaction would make some sense. And that's how the conversations began. I would say that they are very bullish on the combination, which is why they asked for, and they are getting stock in the company," Kreidler said.
CEO William J. DeLaney also confirmed on a call with analysts that Sysco had considered acquiring U.S. Foods before CDR and KKR made their 2007 buyout investment. However, it appears the Houston-based company balked at price.
"We looked at it, I guess, almost seven years, six and half years ago, when it was sold. I think the industry was different there in terms of where we saw growth and opportunity. Valuation was an issue at that point in time," DeLaney said. "I think we've got the best of both worlds here in terms of synergy opportunities, but also a mindset for continuous improvement," he added.
As CDR and KKR sought to exit the near 7-year old investment, one would assume Sysco had the best deal on the table, preferable to a drawn out IPO process. In that sense Sysco's patience appears to have paid off and at a time of pressure for the firm's profit margins.
Yet the merger of the two biggest food distributors in the U.S. raises some big risks for investors.
Analysts peppered Sysco's CEO DeLaney on a conference call about possible antitrust issues and the prospect that the Federal Trade Commission could ask for significant divestitures of Sysco and U.S. Foods' overlapping businesses.
Further, even if investors approve of Sysco's attempt to improve scale and cut costs across its businesses after multiple quarters of profit margin contraction, the merger may come with the poor optics of significant layoffs, office closures and customer defections.
On the antitrust side, DeLaney appeared to concede that divestitures could be a part of a FTC review, however, he stood by synergy forecasts Sysco laid out in its press release.
"[We] expect as we've signaled, that there will be a review process and it will take several months and we'll have some good discussions along those lines. So, there could very well be some divestitures. Our point I think is that, we've modeled what we can today, and even with some divestitures, we still see this as a very attractive deal," DeLaney said.
Sysco calculated that it will be buying US Foods at a multiple of just under 10 times the company's trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA of $826 million. The transaction is expected to yield annual cost synergies of at least $600 million after three to four years, Sysco said, primarily from supply chain efficiencies, merchandising activities, and overlapping general and administrative functions.
DeLaney also confirmed Sysco's expectation that the combined company will control about a quarter of the U.S. foodservices market, while maintaining that the company believes it is an extremely fragmented and price-competitive industry.
"We think our market share is about 18% and they're about half our size. So, mathematically, you're talking, whatever, 25% give or take. With that said, the market's a very dynamic market. I mentioned before, there is 16,000, 15000, 16,000 distributors out there," DeLaney said.
Whether or not antitrust regulators agree with DeLaney and Sysco's industry assessment is another story.
"[We] believe the anti-trust/regulatory review could prove to be a lengthy and difficult process. As regional/local market share information on the food-services industry is not readily available from third parties, it is not easy for outsiders to assess market share concentration," Jefferies analysts pointed out in a Monday client note.
"From a broader industry perspective, SYSCO's 18% share, joining with US Foods 9% share doesn't sound overly concentrated, but with #1 joining with #2, there is a chance that some adjustments or market divestitures could be required by regulators," they concluded.