Boeing Contract Vote Produces Winners and Losers
SEATTLE ( TheStreet) -- Score one for Boeing
Also, score one for the IAM and its national leadership. The union got to the right answer despite a difficult negotiating environment in which two votes were rushed, workers had little information in the first election, the company held all the cards and the union's internal disagreement was publicly exposed. Democracy isn't pretty.
Who were the losers in the contract talks? That one is easy. Boeing said 22 states submitted proposals for 777X work. Washington won. South Carolina didn't get the 777X, but it did get a $1 billion expansion of its 787 facility.
So 20 states got nothing. Some including Washington publicly fawned over Boeing, offering all manners of tax incentives. Fawning over a company is unbecoming, but fawning and losing is even more so.
Overall, the Boeing contract negotiation story is a sign of the times. Big companies generally get what they want, whether by lobbying Congress or threatening to move. The union movement has been badly weakened in recent years, but it has managed to hang on at Boeing and at airlines and automakers.
And everywhere exists the belief that whatever works is worth doing. This belief inspires states and cities to compete against one another, not just for good jobs like those at Boeing but also, in far less logical scenarios, for professional sports teams.
Looking at Boeing, it is a fabulously successful company that submitted a concessionary contract "offer" accompanied by a threat to place its new work outside the Seattle area, its principal home since 1916. The offer included reduced health care benefits, fixed rate salary increases, elimination of a defined benefit pension plan and foregoing the right to strike until 2024.
Boeing won because it got a better contract, it prevented any IAM work stoppage until at least 2024, and it was spared the trouble of relocating work away from its home.
As for the IAM, it suffered because its internal squabbles were exposed to the world. That is never good for anyone, whether it happens in a divorce case filing or in a contract dispute. But to its credit, the union got to the right answer.
IAM national leadership had to overrule local leadership. Local leaders were wrong to stand in the way of a second vote by their members. Also, they chose not to recognize a harsh reality. But they were not wrong to stand up for the defined benefit pension plans they had so carefully protected and for retention of their right to strike in 2016. Union contracts, often enabled by the right to strike, once ensured good working conditions for most Americans.