JPMorgan Escapes Energy Probe With Cheap Slap on Wrist (Update 1)

Tickers in this article: JPM

Updated from 8:55 a.m. ET with morning market action and a statement from JPMorgan Chase.

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- JPMorgan Chase agreed to settle energy market manipulation charges.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Tuesday announced the bank's energy trading subsidiary, JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. (JPMVEC), had agreed to "pay $410 million in penalties and disgorgement to ratepayers for allegations of market manipulation stemming from the company's bidding activities in electricity markets in California and the Midwest from September 2010 through November 2012."

JPMorgan's shares were down slightly in morning trading to $55.56, giving up earlier gains that may have reflected investors' relief that the company was able to move beyond one of the many regulatory investigations it is undergoing, without admitting fault, at a relatively cheap price.

JPMorgan's energy subsidiary will pay a $285 million civil penalty to the U.S. Treasury and return "$125 million in unjust profits" -- in the words of the FERC -- with $124 million going to ratepayers in the California Independent System Operator and $1 million to the ratepayers in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator.

FERC on Monday had released a letter listing preliminary findings that JPMVEC had "engaged in five manipulative bidding strategies designed to improperly obtain payments at above-market rates from the California Independent System Operator" between September 2010 and June 2011. The agency also said in the letter that JPMVEC had engaged in three "manipulative strategies" to obtain "excessive payments" from the Midwest Independent System Operator.

JPMorgan Chase said last Friday it was exploring "strategic alternatives " for its physical commodities business, including energy trading.

According to FERC's statement announcing the settlement, JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. "admits the facts set forth in the agreement, but neither admits nor denies the violations."

FERC said its "investigators determined that JPMVEC engaged in 12 manipulative bidding strategies designed to make profits from power plants that were usually out of the money in the marketplace. In each of them, the company made bids designed to create artificial conditions that forced the ISOs to pay JPMVEC outside the market at premium rates."