Odds Favor Endocyte Receiving European Approval For Ovarian Cancer Drug
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. ( TheStreet) -- The next significant catalyst for Endocyte
I learn towards a positive approval recommendation on vintafolide from Europe, but Endocyte's application is not without risks. The company has told investors its interactions with European drug reviewers to date have been generally supportive of vintafolide but we all know this doesn't insure a favorable outcome. With that said, I'm bullish about Endocyte and its ovarian cancer drug regardless of the European approval decision.
Vintafolide is a small molecule drug conjugate (SMDC) that targets the folate receptor on cancer cells to precisely deliver a potent cytotoxic payload. Vintafolide's design is quite similar to antibody drug conjugates made by Seattle Genetics
Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer that does not respond to platinum-based chemotherapy have few effective therapies available and a poorer prognosis than patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. (Median overall survival of 12.4 months compared to 24.3 months, according to published studies.) Ovarian cancer over-expressing the folate receptor is associated with even poorer outcomes for patients. Given the dire need of new treatments for these patients, Endocyte filed for conditional approval of vintafolide in Europe based on positive phase II data.
The phase II data of vintafolide are not without controversy and regulatory risk. Treatment with vintafolide led to a statistically significant delay in tumor progression or death for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer expressing the folate receptor. The hazard ratio for these "FR100" patients (100% of tumors expressing the folate recceptor) was 0.38, meaning the risk of tumor progression or death was reduced by 62%.
For vintafolide-treated patients with tumors that had folate receptor expression in the range of 10% to 100%, the hazard ratio was 0.55, or a 45% reduction in the risk of tumor progression or death.
Patients with ovarian cancer expressing less than 10% folate receptors saw no benefit following vintafolide treatment, as expected.
The main concern about the phase II study was that treatment with vintafolide had no beneficial impact on survival. In fact, the overall survival hazard ratio was greater than 1, meaning treatment with vintafolide might have had a detrimental effect. The overall survival analysis was not statistical significant so the appropriate interpretation is to reach no conclusion on vintafolide's effect on survival. Still, an overall survival hazard ratio greater than 1 doesn't look good and will naturally raise concerns.
Digging into the phase II data further reveals an imbalance between the vintafolide and control arms where the control arm patients seemed to have significantly more positive diagnostic factors. If you control for that imbalance the overall survival hazard ratio drops well below 1 i.e. shifts in favor of vintafolide.