Linn Energy Announces Informal SEC Inquiry, Maintains Dividend
Updated from 12:43 p.m. ET to include closing share prices and additional data throughout.
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Linn Energy
The Houston-based company said in a statement it has voluntarily agreed to disclose information to the SEC's informal review and that the regulator has requested the preservation of documents and communications relevant to the company's proposed merger with Berry Petroleum, its use of non-GAAP financial measures relayed to investors and its hedging strategies.
Linn, however, said it remains confident it will complete its merger with Berry and that the informal inquiry shouldn't be seen as a negative stance by the SEC of its business.
"The SEC has stated that the fact of the inquiry should not be construed as an indication that the SEC or its staff has a negative view of any entity, individual or security," the company said in a statement. "Although the impact of the inquiry on the timing of LinnCo's proposed merger with Berry Petroleum Company is difficult to predict, LinnCo and LINN remain committed to the completion of the transaction."
LINN and LinnCo, a unit the company is using to acquire Berry, are cooperating fully with the SEC, both companies said.
On Monday, Linn Energy and LinnCo maintained their high dividend yields by announcing monthly cash distributions of $0.2416 per share, or $2.90 on an annualized basis. The distribution will be payable to shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 10.
"While we remain confident in LINN's overall financial health and the soundness of its financial statements, we cannot ignore the uncertainty that the SEC inquiry has brought to the partnership's near-term outlook," Kevin Smith, a Raymond James analyst wrote in a Tuesday downgrade of the company. The analyst said the inquiry could delay the Berry deal by at least 30 days, however, Linn's business model and outlook "remain sound."
Linn Energy shares closed down nearly 19% to $27.05 in Tuesday trading. LinnCo shares fell nearly 17% to $30.90, while Berry Petroleum shares fell nearly 6% to $39.86.
Berry's proposed merger comes amid scrutiny from major financial media and independent research firms into earnings and cash flow of Linn Energy.
Questions about the ability of Linn Energy to fund its large dividend and its accounting practices on derivative hedges have caused significant volatility in the company's shares and its all-stock exchange with Berry.
The SEC's informal review, while not a confirmation of concerns about Linn's accounting, likely creates a new challenge for the oil and gas driller. A handful of analysts downgraded their ratings and price targets for Linn Energy given the uncertainty of the review, however, few expressed concern over the company's long-term earnings or strategy.
In late June, Sterne Agee analyst Tim Rezvan said Berry Petroleum was fairly valued at $44 a share in the company's anticipated stock merger with Linn.
In the wake of the SEC's informal review Rezvan wrote Tuesday, "we see 15% upside in
Linn and Berry said in late March they had delayed a shareholder meeting on their merger until the third quarter of 2013. Both companies expressed confidence in a close of the merger.
The SEC's concern likely relates to Linn's practice of reconciling its GAAP operating cash flow with a non-GAAP measure it calls distributable cash flow (DCF), Rezvan said. To derive DCF, Linn has capitalized the cost of premiums it pays for puts contracts to hedge its energy price risk.
Linn said earlier this year it did not expect to buy additional put contracts, however, the practice has boosted DCF by $911 million from 2009-2012, and by $583 million in 2012, Rezvan calculated.
"While clearly expensing these costs represents the more conservative approach to calculating DCF, we believe recent chatter around the issue overstates the impact of this convention on LINE's financial metrics," Praneeth Satish, a Wells Fargo analyst, wrote in a Tuesday client note.
Linn's distributable cash flow covered 88% of its recently increased dividend payments, even as the company reported a GAAP net loss in its most recent quarter.
Satish valued Linn Energy's natural gas put portfolio at about $330 million, given current prices. A sale of the portfolio, Satish said, would not impact forecasts on Linn's five-year dividend growth rate.
Recent analysis from Barron's and Hedgeye Risk Management put a spotlight on derivative accounting practices at Linn Energy that the investment community had already brought to light, Rezvan of Sterne Agee said in June
Leon Cooperman of Omega Advisors said in late June the hedge fund had received positive feedback from Berry Petroleum's management on its merger with Linn Energy.
Cooperman said in a June 19 CNBC interview the $8.4 billion hedge fund has also done its homework on Linn Energy and remains an investor in the embattled company.
Omega Advisors is Linn Energy's largest outside investor, with a 3.05% holding in the company's shares worth more than $200 million, according to March 31 SEC filings compiled by Bloomberg. Omega also owns 1.96% of LinnCo, the data show.
Omega Advisors isn't concerned with how Linn Energy accounts for a hedging program the firm has in place to reduce its exposure to volatile energy prices, Cooperman said to CNBC.
Through a spokesperson, Omega Advisors declined to comment on Linn Energy's Monday disclosure of an informal SEC review.