Google Has the Platform Problem, Not Facebook and Other 'Apps'
In one respect, it's absurd to hammer on Google. It's a multibillion-dollar powerhouse that turned its name into a verb. Nothing but two fist taps to the chest respect on that one. At the same time, however, Google generates nearly all of its revenue (96% at last check) from advertising.
Of course, Google nicely situates its core advertising business across various lucrative platforms. Nonetheless, in terms of revenue, Google is pretty much a one-trick pony. That pony is a stud, no doubt, but it has not done a good job at all monetizing its many other hobbies and innovations.
Wouldn't it be nice to see Google turn something else it does into a billion-dollar revenue stream, sort of the way Amazon.com(AMZN) does with Amazon Web Services? Does everything at Google have to exist simply to build what has become a less-focused brand and its advertising business?
As I wrote an article discussing how Google could put Yelp(YELP) out of business with one puff, I wondered why the company is not more aggressive taking out the Yelps of the world and, more importantly, building new businesses that generate fresh revenue lines.
While I do not want to see Google spread itself thin, it has the opportunity to do more. Ultimately, that "more" might merely further drive advertising revenues. That would not be a bad thing, but it could also translate into something bigger.
In many ways, Google produces content that is no better than what you can get from Yahoo!(YHOO) . In fact, I argue that Yahoo! actually produces better content than Google; Yahoo! has just done a horrific job leveraging/monetizing that content.
When I want content (news, sports, finance) I instantly go to Yahoo! In fact, I have the site tabbed multiple times on my browser - the Yahoo! homepage, my portfolio page at Finance and Yahoo! Sports NHL.