Why Won't Intel Just Tell the World It Doesn't Suck?
Around the time Intel announced the "retirement" of CEO Paul Otellini, I challenged the company in Intel CEO Out: It's About Time and Intel Will Die If It Doesn't Think and Act Differently:
Intel needs a visionary CEO, not a chip geek, to come in, put the kibosh on hobbies that will likely go nowhere and reposition the company as a powerhouse. You're simply not going to find that person via the run-of-the-mill look at internal candidates, interview-the-names-the-media-spits-out process.
Intel executives didn't take kindly to my critique.
They "reached out," but told me nothing. All they offered were cryptic comments cloaked in don't count us out, we've got some stuff planned rhetoric.
I never heard from Intel again, even though I was promised follow-up. That's typical of so many companies. Call and yell at a pest, the pest stands up to you and the "conversation" ends. (I told the Intel rep that we wouldn't be having this conversation if Intel didn't miss mobile five years ago and its chips powered smartphones like they do PCs and Macs).
That approach -- typical of large corporations -- does a disservice to investors. That's how Netflix (NFLX) rolls for example. They never let anybody in. They guard the castle and turn the dissemination of information into a game of who can get a "source" to leak something they're not authorized to leak. Every piece of Netflix information I have ever received came to me because somebody said something they weren't supposed to say. That's bad investor, public and media relations.
On the other hand, some companies get a guy like me on the phone and say, Listen, here's the deal. You're actually onto something. I have talked with executives from multiple companies in the last few months who tell me I'm spot on (or close to it) in my criticism and here's how we're moving forward to address the situation. Out of respect for these executives, I won't name names; just search my article history.