Kass: The Earnings Snow Job
NEW YORK (Real Money) -- Similar to this past weekend's brutal blizzard, the interpretation of fourth-quarter 2012 U.S. corporate profits and the expectations for prosperity in 2013 is another big snow job. The current disconnect between stock prices and the slowing pace of earnings growth is reminiscent of the second half of 2007. The difference between then and now is 2007's emerging weakness was centered in the financial sector. By contrast, in late 2012 and expected in early 2013, the profit weakness is more broad-based.
Today, despite analysts and strategists unrealistic optimism, participants' confidence in the markets is elevated, as investors have cared little about slowing growth. Reality will prevail, however, as ultimately corporate profits are the mother's milk (hat tip to Sir Larry Kudlow) of the markets.
At the start of the earnings season, the consensus forecast for fourth-quarter 2012 S&P 500 profits was about $25.50 a share -- now, with over 80% of the companies reporting, $23.50 a share looks more likely. As Alhambra Partners opines, "missing fourth quarter 2012 by 20% is not a rounding error."
A disappointing picture for S&P earnings lies at the core of my ursine market views. In the fullness of time, it will not likely be ignored.
I continue to see an earnings cliff ahead.
Consensus, top-down and bottom-up 2013 forecasts for the S&P 500 are at $108 a share, $107 a share and $112 a share, respectively, up from about $102 a share expected in 2012.
My projection is for $100 a share or less for S&P profits -- well below 2013 consensus and under the anticipated actual 2012 earnings.
I was recently asked by Melissa Lee on "Fast Money," whether the S&P is cheaper today than it was when it made a high in 2007. In that appearance, I explained that markets discount the future, not the past -- and Zero Hedge illustrates my point that stocks today are more expensive today compared to 2007.