Relational's Manitowoc Stake Has the Badger State in Play
Updated from 11:54 a.m. to include comment from professor in the seventh paragraph.
NEW YORK (TheStreet) - Wisconsin-based machinery firms have drawn the interest of activist investors, but it isn't entirely clear whether hard-charging hedge funds will have their way in the 'badger state.'
In late 2012, Carl Icahn failed to win a $32.50 a share tender offer for Oshkosh, WI.-based specialty truck manufacturer Oshkosh
Similar to Icahn, whose multiple proposals for Oshkosh culminated in a failed tender offer, Relational will face a fairly high bar in trying to get its recommendations enacted at Manitowoc. Both companies are incorporated in Wisconsin, a state that gives corporate boards extra protections from activist shareholders who are increasingly playing a prominent role in Corporate America.
Manitowoc's board of directors will benefit from provision 80.027 in Wisconsin corporate law, which provides that the board of directors can consider interests beyond those of shareholders when coming up with corporate policy. In the case of Manitowoc, the company could take into account a multitude of non-shareholder interests when deciding how to respond to Relational.
Those factors include the effects of the board's action on employees, suppliers and customers of the corporation, in addition to the effect of the action on the community where the corporation does business. A Wisconsin-based company can also consider "any other factors that the director or officer consider pertinent," creating open-ended ways to fend off the recommendations of an activist shareholder.
"In short, there is no legal obligation for the board to believe that Relational's recommendation trumps anything the board has in mind. The board runs the show here. Period," Brian J.M. Quinn, an associate professor at Boston College's School of Law and an M&A expert, said in a Friday e-mail.
"As long as Relational is talking to Manitowoc about corporate strategy and is not mounting a takeover, Wisconsin law won't interfere with the process," Erik Gordon, a professor of business and law at the University of Michigan said in an e-mail. "The law looms in the background because if Relational is unhappy about the results of its talks with management and thinks about going hostile, it will think about the delay and expense imposed in Wisconsin," Gordon added.
BMO Capital Markets analyst Charles Brady said in a Friday report Manitowoc's incorporation would make it hard for Relational to acquire an above 10% stake without management's approval. The analyst also noted that Manitowoc's bylaws require at least a two-thirds majority vote to replace or elect board directors, which "could make it difficult for Relational to secure board positions to effect the change it seeks," the analyst said.
Icahn faced those types of issues when advocating a flurry of change to Oshkosh that culminated in his $32.50 a share tender offer in early December 2012. Only 22% of Oshkosh shares were tendered to Icahn at that time, below a threshold of 25% where he would have moved forward with his takeover bid. At the time, Icahn was also running a proxy campaign to replace Oshkosh's entire board of directors.
Had Icahn seen more success in his tender, it might have helped the activist have increasing sway on Oskhosk's board, allowing him to overcome some of the extra-powers afforded to corporate boards in the state of Wisconsin.
Relational's Proposal for Manitowoc
Perhaps Relational will have to run a similarly aggressive campaign against Manitowoc as Icahn did with Oshkosh. To give Relational and its co-founders Ralph Whitworth and David Batchelder credit, they have run a string of successful activist efforts aimed at splitting up corporations such as Timken
Whitworth was appointed to Hewlett-Packard's
Relational is asking that Manitowoc split off its food service business from its crane businesses, given a lack of synergy between the two divisions. As separate, pure-play companies, Relational believes both businesses will garner a higher multiple by stock investors.
It appears that Manitowoc disagrees. Relational said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that after meeting with management, they believe the company has decided its food service and cranes businesses provide diversification. Crane orders are tied to demand in the highly cyclical residential and commercial construction market, whereas food services are far more stable.
Manitowoc "appears to maintain the combination of the less cyclical Food business in order to mute the inherent cyclicality of the Crane business," Relational said in its SEC filing. It believes that "this business combination causes the Company to trade at a perpetual discount, as reflected in the Company's stock price performance and its EV/EBITDA multiple which is more closely in line with its public crane comparable than its public food equipment comparable (which trades at a significant premium to the Crane business)."
"[W]ith the existing structure the Company will continue to trade at a discount due to the widely divergent business characteristics of the Food and Crane businesses and the lack of meaningful synergies," Relational concludes, while also providing recommendations on how Manitowoc's foods business can improve its operating performance.
The hedge fund also said it believes Manitowoc can commit additional capital to share repurchases and dividends, and it recommended that the company structure future debt offerings to mitigate the costs of a spin-off of its foods business.