Tim Cook Must Go, He's No Better Than Ron Johnson
Skim this article from March 13, 2013 -- Tim Cook Might Have Made an Absolutely Devastating Mistake. It hammers home the core of the thesis AAPL bears chose and choose to ignore. On Page Two, it links to two more key pieces that do what few others are willing to do. Call into question the decision to consummate and continue Tim Cook's tenure as Apple CEO.
October 1, 2012: If Steve Jobs Were Alive He Would Fire Tim Cook
CNBC made a big deal about that one:
And then ...
In isolation -- in the emotional vacuum that is part and parcel with being hyper-bullish a battleground stock -- the things I bring up in the above-linked articles and CNBC video feel insignificant. In and of themselves, Tim Cook's missteps appear benign.
Capitulating to the public on how to allocate capital. Butchering the release of Apple Maps. Allowing people such as David Einhorn to control the conversation that surrounds Apple. Ending the incredibly effective practice of sandbagging guidance. No big deal on their own. Put them together, however, and you look back on each as signs that Tim Cook got in over his head and might ultimately beat Apple into the ground.
When you think about it -- how is the situation with Cook at Apple any different than what went down with Ron Johnson at J.C. Penney
There's one significant difference: Johnson took over a mess, whereas Cook inherited a company firing on all cylinders. The trajectory of the two names, by and large, has been about the same. Of course, relative to JCP, AAPL enjoys a slight bit of cushion.
But there are so many similarities.
Apple and J.C. Penney hired men who performed admirably under Steve Jobs. Both boards of directors went all-in, convinced that Cook and Johnson delivered true unfiltered results. At this point, however, it's all but an objective statement of fact -- these cats enjoyed the rare thrill of riding shotgun with Steve Jobs.