Facebook Advertising Works and Couldn't Be More Fair
Outside of IPO-related gripes, which have all but blown over, the biggest material moan people had about Zuck was that he needed to ease up on the social mission and run Facebook like a business. Generate revenue. Make massive profits.
With a flawlessness Cook could only dream of, Zuck appears to have maintained Facebook's start-up culture while transforming the company into a mobile monetization powerhouse with its best days still ahead of it.
I have seen the present and the future of social media advertising and it's name is Facebook. You can, by the way, go to and "Like" TheStreet's Facebook page here.
I never bought the notion that it's an ineffective or somehow unfair place to advertise. Mark Cuban got it all wrong . And, now, we're making way too much of Nick Bilton's contention that Facebook must be gaming its newsfeed to get users to promote posts.
Roughly five months into my job as TheStreet's director of social media, I can tell you -- firsthand -- that Facebook advertising works incredibly well for a brand/multimedia organization such as TheStreet. In fact, I argue that if Facebook's platform doesn't work for you, you're simply not doing it right.
Without giving away TMI and upsetting our CEO, I will hit several points in defense of Facebook, starting with common criticisms of the platform and finishing with details of TheStreet's performance. As we consider the company's long-term vision and potential, I consider this information incredibly useful, even if anecdotal, for investors.
I don't see why it's a problem that a) Facebook requires brands to pay more money to reach a larger audience (Cuban's beef and it is true; that's how FB advertising works) and b) Facebook allegedly, according to Bilton's experiment, prioritizes shared content with advertising dollars behind it over shared content posted without the financial push. (For the record, I actually believe Bilton here). Isn't this the type of thing we wanted to see from Zuckerberg? Wasn't this the main criticism of Facebook, that it wasn't doing enough to monetize its massive user base? Now, it's doing just that -- going for revenue at the same time as it attempts to realize its righteous social mission -- yet we're still on Zuck's case. The guy can't win. It's important to point out that there's likely a distinction between user-generated content (stuff you post from your personal Facebook page) and content brands such as TheStreet post. In other words, I would suspect Facebook treats a Nick Bilton post differently than a New York Times post and a Rocco Pendola post differently than a TheStreet post from an advertising placement standpoint considering the difference between paying $7 to promote a post as a single user and spending hundreds or thousands of dollars per month as a brand. In terms of results, again, I am not sure how a brand, in particular, could not see results. The ability to target specific audiences with tailored content and see immediate results makes it almost impossible to screw up a Facebook advertising campaign over the long term. As we have scaled into a somewhat considerable Facebook advertising push, TheStreet has seen the number of people who "Like" its page grow from about 30,000 at the end of 2012 to 45,038, as of this writing. That's an increase of roughly 50%. And the pace of this uptick continues to increase alongside our following with meaningful organic growth to boot. Engagement on our Facebook page is literally through the roof. Sharing, comments and post, as well as the above-mentioned page "Likes" are all up exponentially. Month-over-month (between January and February of this year), traffic from Facebook to TheStreet.com increased by 85%.