Apple Would Do Better Spending that Cash

Tickers in this article: AAPL SCTY TSLA YHOO

NEW YORK (TheStreet) - Kudos to Apple for figuring how to legally shuffle $44 billion in profits to non-tax jurisdictions.

Unfortunately, while the iPhone designer may have broken new ground in tax avoidance -- according to a Senate Subcommittee on Investigations -- the company would be better off not holding the most swollen bank account among non-financial companies in the history of Corporate America.

Currently, Apple is sitting on about $137 billion in relatively interest free cash. The company even recently raised $17 billion in debt financing to boost its dividend and increase share buybacks, while leaving its cash untouched.

Apple would be far better positioned if CEO Tim Cook figured out how to utilize the company's cash pile, instead of having to defend it before a Senate subcommittee.

Yes, repatriating billions in foreign earnings might be a tough move for Apple shareholders to swallow because of an up-to-35% tax hit, however, over the long-term they may be far better off doing so.

Through acquisitions, for instance burgeoning electric car pioneer Tesla as a Bloomberg Viewscolumn recommended, residential and commercial solar panel maker Solar City , Square or Twitter, Apple might be able to eventually garner returns that would far exceed its virtually interest-and-tax-free cash stockpile.

Since Apple's cash currently sits in low-interest bank accounts, the company should be devoting its time figuring out how to deploy money into new projects, acquisitions and innovation that will boost earnings and grow shareholder value over the long-run.

Instead, CEO Tim Cook and COO Peter Oppenheimer have been hauled in front of Congress to defend Apple's cash stockpile and it's legal use of a 74,000 page tax code to minimize the company's tax bill.

What a waste.

If Apple weren't so big - it currently is about the same market cap as ExxonMobil -- the company's cash stockpile would receive far more scrutiny.

For instance, the Cupertino, Calif-based tech titan would be a prime takeover candidate with its single digit price to earnings ratio excluding cash if it weren't for the company's $400 billion-plus market capitalization.

Were Apple a twentieth the size, private equity firms would likely look at Apple's cash-rich balance sheet as a reflection of complacency. Yes, Apple continues to post mind-boggling profits from the iPhone and iPad but those earnings are falling.

Apple's cash stockpile represents about one third of the company's overall market cap.

Given the maturation of mobile device markets, Apple should be deploying its cash to build altogether new businesses and products.

Tesla, for instance, appears on the cusp of pioneering a new consumer market for electric vehicles, while Elon Musk-run Solar City, First Solar and others are moving fast in equipping a resurgent residential and commercial real estate market with alternative energy solutions.

Square is moving quickly to reshape the way consumers treat money, leveraging iPhones and iPads, while Twitter has empowered hundreds of millions of voices, also on mobile products.

Adobe and Netflix come to mind as other bolt-ons for a company as large as Apple.

Yahoo! , once a poster-child of board mismanagement on Monday announced a deal to buy Tumblr, expending about a third of the company's cash. That move, CEO Marissa Mayer's boldest yet since taking the reins of the fledgling web search pioneer in 2012, is helping to reshape the narrative of the company after a decade of stagnation.

Apple, in contrast, is vigorously defending the status quo. Nothing says so much as the company's treatment of its cash.

Apple was dropping 0.2% to $441.67. Shares have fallen 17% in 2013 compared to the Nasdaq Composite Index which has added 16% this year.